Dear all, this coming Friday we shall finish off the introduction to the theory of relativity and discuss some of its interpretations, as well as some of its implications for the philosophy of time. The reading for this week is a paper by Balashov criticising an attempt (by William Craig) to defend presentism within a relativistic framework.
Essential Reading
Balshov - Presentism and Relativity
Further Readings
Hinchliff - A defence of Presentism in a Relativistic Setting
Mellor - Special Relativity and Present Truth
Craig - The Tenseless Theory of Time
Week 3: The Special Theory of Relativity and its Philosophical Implications
Dear all, next Friday we are going to introduce Einstein´s Theory of Special Relativity. It is the worst nightmare for those who think that time passes. As an introductory chapter I chose Dainton´s Time and Space (pp 313-327). I also recommend the first chapters of Russell´s ABC of Relativity (up to p. 69).
Those of you who would like to get a slightly more formal grasp of it can read the (relatively easy) Fynman´s Lectures (chapters 15-17) or the (wonderful but mathematically impervious) Fridman´s Foundations of Spacetime Theories.
See you all there. Abs.
Essential Readings
Dainton - Time and Space (313-327)
Russell - The ABC of Relativity (1-69)
Further Readings
Feynman - Lectures in Physics
Friedman - Foundations of Spacetime Theories
Those of you who would like to get a slightly more formal grasp of it can read the (relatively easy) Fynman´s Lectures (chapters 15-17) or the (wonderful but mathematically impervious) Fridman´s Foundations of Spacetime Theories.
See you all there. Abs.
Essential Readings
Dainton - Time and Space (313-327)
Russell - The ABC of Relativity (1-69)
Further Readings
Feynman - Lectures in Physics
Friedman - Foundations of Spacetime Theories
Week 2: Understanding McTaggart´s Inconsistency Argument
Dear all, next week we will discuss in more details McTaggart´s argument for the inconsistency of the A-theory. As I said, it is easy to misconstrue the argument. To avoid this, I chose a recent version of it by Kit Fine, which does not involve second order A-properties or infinite regresses. It seems to me that this version captures something essential about the argument. You will find it in Chapter 8 of the linked book Modality and Tense. The chapter is rather long, if you are in a hurry or feel too lazy for it, the argument is presented in pages 270-284.
The other essential reading is a defence of the standard version of the argument, by LePoidevin and Mellor (a hero of the B-theory).
Essential Readings
Fine - Modality and Tense
Lepoidevin and Mellor - Time, Change and the ´Indexical Fallacy´
Further Readings
Dummett - A Defence of McTaggart Proof
Oaklander - McTaggart´s Paradox and Smith´s Tensed Theory of Time
Lowe - McTaggart´s Paradox Revisited
The other essential reading is a defence of the standard version of the argument, by LePoidevin and Mellor (a hero of the B-theory).
Essential Readings
Fine - Modality and Tense
Lepoidevin and Mellor - Time, Change and the ´Indexical Fallacy´
Further Readings
Dummett - A Defence of McTaggart Proof
Oaklander - McTaggart´s Paradox and Smith´s Tensed Theory of Time
Lowe - McTaggart´s Paradox Revisited
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)